|
Archived: P2Rx no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
|
|
The textile industry has historically been a large consumer of manmade, natural and human resources. Significant amounts of energy, chemicals, water and human labor are required to produce the majority of textile products. Many of these resources have historically been cheap and combined with the lack of global competition for markets, the U.S. textile industry has had little incentive to improve efficiency.
Over the last decade or so the pressures to improve efficiency have increased dramatically. These pressures include:
Table 1 Table 2 1994
Cost of Pollution Abatement Equipment
These pressures have led many textile manufactures to significantly increase investments in more efficient and less labor-intensive production techniques and technologies.
The textile industry invested more than $2 billion annually in new plants and state-of-the-art equipment from 1987 onward, reaching a peak of almost $3 billion in capital investment in 1994. These investments have lead to a 165 percent increase in productivity over the last decade in specific sectors of the industry, allowing the American textile industry to be ranked as one of the most efficient and productive textile industries in the world.
Of the pressures presented, the competition from Asian exporters has had the greatest impact on U.S. textile operations in recent years. In 1997-98, the collapse of currencies of almost all the major textile exporting countries in Asia caused a shock wave of artificially low-priced textile and apparel products to hit the United States. Despite the success in modernization and productivity increase in the American textile industry, the flood of low-cost apparel and textile goods on the U.S. market and around the world has lead to significant plant closing and job losses across the country. (Table 3 provides information on job losses and plant closures and Table 4 provides information on the economic statistics of the industry).
Table 3 Textile Job Losses and Plant Closures Table 4 Economic Statistics
As the American textile industry begins to recover from increasing international competition, continued investment in more efficient and less labor-intensive production techniques and technologies will assist the industry in remaining a major force in the United States and and in the global economy while reducing its environmental impact.
Cost of Labor and Materials in the Textile Industry
Cost of all employees per value of shipment1
$0.17/$1.00
Cost of materials (raw materials, energy, etc.) per value of shipment
$0.58/$1.00
Cost of employees and materials per value of shipment
$0.75/$1.00
1
1999 Annual Survey of Manufacturers for NAIC 313 Textile Mills
Category
End of line ($ million)
Production Process Enhancements ($ million)
Total($ million)
Capitol
expenditures for air1
11.9
11.8
23.8
Capitol
expenditures for water1
16.3
14.4
30.7
Capitol
expenditures by industry for solid/contained waste1
?
?
4.9
Total
pollution abatement costs and expenditures1
59.3
Value
of shipments 19942
78,267.3
1? Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures 1994 for SIC 2200 Textile Mill Products
2? 1994 Annual Survey of Manufacturers for SIC 2200 Textile Mill Products
Since Crisis Began*
2001
Textile Jobs Lost
177,000 / -28%
67,000 / -13%
Textile Plants Closed
207
103
Source:
Statistical Overview of the Crisis in U.S. Textiles
Since Crisis Began*
2001
Textile Fiber Consumption (cotton spinning system)
-25%
-14%
Textile Shipments
-18%
- 9%
Broadwoven Fabric Production
-19%
-10%
Knit Fabric Production
-30% (through 1999)
N/A
Producer Prices for Yarn
-10%
- 4%
Producer Prices for Broadwoven Fabric
-8%
+0.4%
Source: Statistical Overview of the Crisis in U.S. Textiles
|
The Topic Hub™ is a product of the Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx) The Textiles Topic Hub™ was developed by:
Hub Last Updated: 3/11/2008 |
![]() |
P2RIC is a member of the Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange, a national network of regional information centers: NEWMOA (northeast), ESRC (southeast), GLRPPR (Great Lakes), ZeroWasteNet (southwest), P2RIC (plains), Peaks to Prairies (mountain), WSPPN (Pacific southwest), PPRC (northwest). |
| The Nebraska Business Development Center (NBDC) at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNO) operates the Pollution Prevention Regional Information Center. | |
| You are on new server. | |
|
P2Ric is fortunate to receive funding from the US Environmental Protection Agency. For more information on the EPA and its programs, please visit http://www.epa.gov |
|||
| All contents Copyright ©2009 P2RIC. All Rights Reserved. | |||
