|
Archived: P2Rx no longer updates this information, but it may be useful as a reference or resource.
|
|
Implementing integrated pest management procedures in schools typically involves common-sense steps for reducing the need to rely upon chemicals for pest control. It establishes action thresholds for ongoing pollution prevention with schools caused by routine pest management controls. Starting an integrated pest management program with an established action threshold is key to preventing pollution caused by routine pest management. Without a national policy that establishes a consistent guideline for all public schools, approaches vary slightly from state to state. While some states have established some guidelines, often the impetus arises from the school districts or the local communities. Components of each of the following are suggested in effective IPM plans. IPM provides a systematic process for controlling both interior and exterior pests without reliance upon chemicals. Within the school?s IPM policy, include statements that encourage establishment of action thresholds (what are acceptable and unacceptable population numbers of any pest) and action plans for sightings of pests. Action plans should include standards for acceptable applicator services and appropriate treatment strategies. Communication to staff and parents should recognize their rights-to-know about any treatments. All treatments should begin with the least-toxic and least-hazardous alternatives. Sample policies and plans are available through Landscaping The simple practice of keeping shrubby vegetation away from the building will reduce the risk of structural pests. Observe the building/vegetation interface beginning at the ground level and going up to and including the roofline. Keep highly fragrant flowering plants that attract insects away from play areas and along pathways. Fragrant flowering plants are valuable pollinator attractants yet, can create unnecessary risks for children with allergies. Pollution Prevention Pollution Prevention Options Hiring and Working with a Professional Pest Control Service Education EPA Pesticide Registration The Topic Hub™ is a product of the Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange (P2Rx) The Integrated Pest Management (IPM) for Schools Topic Hub™ was developed by:
Hub Last Updated: 5/2/2009
Action Thresholds in School IPM Programs and
Alternatives to Using Pesticides in Schools.
Native plant landscaping is an effective technique for reducing chemical use on the school campus. Relying upon plants indigenous to the community encourages natural controls of plant material. Removal of invasive weeds using manual methods can prevent large population buildups. Landscaping companies that specialize in native plants are available in most communities. Local native plant society members can contribute educational material and plant selection suggestions. State native plant societies can recommend contacts for local affiliates. County extension offices can also offer recommendations on native plant materials and practices.
Reduction of energy use is often closely associated with pesticide prevention techniques. Unnecessary waste of energy can be achieved by sealing cracks, caulking windows, and closing gaps under doors. Sealing around pipes will further reduce energy waste by closing in warm air during the winter and sealing out warm air during the summer, while keeping pests and some allergens out.
Unnecessary use of pesticides (herbicides, rodenticides, and insectides) increases the amount of exposure of hazardous chemicals for children and school staff, and contributes to ongoing pollution in school environments. Exterior overuse of pesticides is known to contribute to water quality degradation and will infiltrate the watershed. Residual pesticides will enter the food chain of local wildlife and will place neighboring pets at risk. Disposal of pesticide containers creates greater risks when they are sent to landfills. Some pesticides reduce indoor air quality for students and subjects them to unnecessary chemical hazards over long periods of time.
Pest management issues address a broad range of areas and pest concerns. Ideal pest management in any environment requires utilization of the least-toxic solution. If conditions warrant, levels of toxicity are increased incrementally until the solution is attained. The following table illustrates only a few examples of potential problem areas, pests, and possible P2 options.
Area Pest/Problem Possible Least-Toxic Actions Library Silverfish/Destruction of books and manuscripts caused by feeding on starches, including glues that bind books Reduce interior humidity; vacuum cracks, crevices, and other harborages; prohibit food in the library; and caulk and seal entry routes. Kitchen Rodents/Contamination of food Caulk and seal entry routes, conduct deep cleaning around cooking areas and in all cracks and crevices, unload deliveries away from kitchen, and monitor all deliveries for hitchhiking pests.
Locker Rooms, Greenhouses, Restrooms Molds, Viruses, and Bacteria/Airborne allergens Repair all leaks and plumbing problems, keep area dry, reduce humidity level, provide air circulation, and clean surfaces with soap and water.
Not all professional pest control services accept the principles of IPM, although the numbers have been increasing. Greater numbers of contractors are recognizing the need to obtain IPM certifications. The process for obtaining this certification varies from state to state, as does the criteria for establishing IPM in schools. Those companies who demonstrate commitments to IPM procedures promote their dedication to non-hazardous control methodology and market their resources and IPM certifications. Certified operators pursue continuing education and training for the most current appropriate and least-hazardous methods and materials, as well as to maintain compliance with any of the state?s requirements. School administrators should learn about health risks associated with traditional pest control methods, as well as the federal and state requirements, before contracting with a pest control service. Visit "How to Hire an IPM Contractor"
Education opportunities that foster pollution prevention through IPM vary and apply to every level of participation. Administrators should learn about health risks associated with traditional pest control methods as well as legal and state requirements. Facility managers need to learn how to manage through sanitation, routine maintenance, and ongoing monitoring. They should also learn about the chemistry of traditional control methods. Everyone should understand harborage requirements of pests. Teachers can work with students to develop classroom methods that complement the school?s IPM plan. Parents can learn from the school and from their children about IPM practices for the home. Different activities in the classroom can teach about pest habitat requirements and recognition. Older students can learn about existing barriers and resistance to change, and hazards associated with use of hazardous materials.
EPA pesticide registration is required for all pesticides and each of their uses. Components and actions of pesticides have been carefully regulated by EPA to ensure that proper use does not pose unreasonable risks to human health or to the environment.
Great Lakes Regional Pollution Prevention Roundtable
Contact email: glrppr@istc.illinois.edu

P2RIC is a member of the Pollution Prevention Resource Exchange, a national network of regional information centers: NEWMOA (northeast), ESRC (southeast), GLRPPR (Great Lakes), ZeroWasteNet (southwest), P2RIC (plains), Peaks to Prairies (mountain), WSPPN (Pacific southwest), PPRC (northwest).
![]()
The Nebraska Business Development Center (NBDC) at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNO) operates the Pollution Prevention Regional Information Center.
You are on new server.
P2Ric is fortunate to receive funding from the US Environmental Protection Agency.
For more information on the EPA and its programs, please visit http://www.epa.gov
All contents Copyright ©2009 P2RIC. All Rights Reserved.